Month: February 2019

Home / Month: February 2019

Darwin’s Fatal Flaw

February 9, 2019 | Darwins Fatal Flaw | No Comments

SETTING THE STAGE

On June 30th 1860, just seven months after the publication of Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species”, there was a debate at Oxford University between Thomas Huxley and Samuel Wiberforce on this very question regarding the origin of information. The debate was if God was really needed to explain life’s origins, or could mere chance (the unguided forces on matter in a chaotic series of collisions) become the new reason to explain our existence. And on the surface, it appears that Huxley won the impossible, where he used for his argument a set of six eternal monkeys who, (given the time and energy) were able type out in a rebellious mocking, the first verse of the 23rd Psalm. Huxley supposedly won the debate, and Darwinism is now the rage of the heathen – God lost the debate, the Cat was deemed a myth, and so the mice can now play. Or so they make a fool’s wager.

So where is the fatal error in Huxley’s argument?

THE FATAL FLAW IN DARWINISM.

Huxley won his argument not because randomness created information – for it cannot as you shall see, but because an unrecognized reader was present and purposed to recognize and discern meaning – in this case he used himself as the reader, and thus exposing the fatal error in Darwinism. For if one takes away the reader which is Intelligently recognizing information – how then can any order or information be recognized? Without keeping this unrecognized Huxleyan Reader present, the entire structure of Darwinian reason falls from just this single stone sunk deep into the giant’s Huxleyan head. Darwinism is dead and they are deceived, blinded to the dire implications that will follow in future posts. more to come…

SEND AN “SOS” TO HUXLEY

February 8, 2019 | Darwin and Dathan | No Comments

What else can one learn from Huxley’s fatal blindness? Well do not all readers require a “language convention” in order to recognize the thoughts attached to those symbols being written? For example, It would of been a far simpler task, expending less time, energy and fuel, had Huxley’s monkeys just simply typed out “SOS” or even using two other keys which symbols express the same meaning, that is “…—…” but… since Morris code was not invented for another 45 years, the Huxleyan reader could not recognize (with intelligence) that any information was there to act upon in this simple set of sequences. So naturally, no life or response could come forth, because no Intelligence or convention was attached to match these symbols to meaning. Therefore even in the simplest of sequences, Intelligence is obviously required – and so Huxley himself, as anyone can now see, merely proved Darwinism is dead without a very well-informed reader present. 

It is fascinating to me how the rebellion to embrace Darwinism is a willful blindness, that ironically keeps them from evolving out of Huxley’s fatal assumption. For what is more complex? The book or the one who reads and reacts to the book? The DVD disk or the player that reads and reacts to the disk? Life is always in the reading of the written – so it a very dangerous wager to reject the Intelligence who wrote you into existence. Information screams Intelligence and you are it’s reader – so be careful how you read and react to this information, we must judge as we will be judged. 

“Know ye that the Lord he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.” – Psalm 100:3 

LET DAWKINS TYPE FOR HUXLEY

February 8, 2019 | Darwins Fatal Flaw | No Comments

But let’s not be too hasty here.

Let’s give poor old Huxley and the Darwinists a real advantage by swamping out Huxley’s six eternal monkeys for an infinite number of eternal Richard Dawkins – only this time, let’s turn off the lights so nothing can be read. Now let them type away in all their brilliant rants – but will anything happen? You know the answer can only be – absolutely nothing! For with the lights off, and no reader can interact in what is written, with no sense to recognize and react (which is the evidence of life being present) there is no reason or science that can be attached to Darwinism or to Dawkin’s worthless contribution – the theory is nothing more than a great con job maintained by the custodians of Marxism. 

THE PROBLEM OF INHERENT ORDER

February 7, 2019 | Darwins Fatal Flaw | No Comments

Another problem is that Huxley had to introduce a machine such as a typewriter which is deceptive thinking again, for the materialists think that matter has the same inherent properties as is designed into any finely tuned simplex machine such as Huxley’s legendary typewriter – but matter does not have these attributes. So Huxley’s argument again is using inherent order already in existence due to Intelligence – not chance. To illustrate this point: Give Huxley’s monkeys a Darwinian box that does not allow any outside Intelligence onto the matter within. Then add the elements of a disassembled typewriter into this box and let the monkeys (or even Richard Dawkins) start turning the box over and over to assemble this machine of Inherent order – then ask yourself these questions… 

Will the chaotic turns inside the box generate or destroy any existing order? 

What is the reasonable expectation we can be predicted with experimental certainty every time? 

We all know the answers to these questions. Random collisions of socialize interactions will ruin the individuality of those elements within the box – which is what Marxism promotes. And every student, every society held within the paradigm of the Darwinian box are destroyed as any distinctive part would be as well. Their unique contribution or potential benefit in society is ruined in the collisions of Darwinian chaos. Anyone knows it is impossible for endogenous assembly to occur – for chaos destroys order – so Darwinism destroys any inherent order in a person’s worth, promoting a societal chaos which must be judged as corrupt. All based on the Darwinian myth that chaos is our author.